Skip to main content
Thesis defences

PhD Oral Exam - Esther Schott, Psychology

Budding bilinguals: Investigating bilingual babies' language acquisition


Date & time
Friday, August 12, 2022
2 p.m. – 4 p.m.
Cost

This event is free

Organization

School of Graduate Studies

Contact

Daniela Ferrer

Where

Psychology Building
7141 Sherbrooke W.
Room 244

Wheel chair accessible

No

When studying for a doctoral degree (PhD), candidates submit a thesis that provides a critical review of the current state of knowledge of the thesis subject as well as the student’s own contributions to the subject. The distinguishing criterion of doctoral graduate research is a significant and original contribution to knowledge.

Once accepted, the candidate presents the thesis orally. This oral exam is open to the public.

Abstract

Almost one in six children in Canada grow up hearing two languages. Bilingual children frequently encounter switches between their languages, and must learn words in both. My thesis tackles three central issues of early bilingual language development.

Manuscript 1 investigated whether infants can detect language switches at the level of individual words. This ability could help infants cope with rapid language switching in their language input, and prepare them, once they start speaking, to have control over which language they use. I tested bilingual and monolingual 8- to 12-month-olds' interest in single-language trials (milk dog) and switched-language trials (milk chien). Neither group showed evidence of differentiating between contexts, suggesting that detection of single-word language switching is more difficult than previously assumed based on prior research investigating multi-sentence language switching.

Manuscript 2 examined whether infants can associate a person with the language that person is speaking. Some theories of early bilingualism propose that person language associations help infants navigate their bilingual language input. I tested 5- to 18-month-olds' surprisal when a speaker switches to a different language. Results showed no evidence that infants spontaneously associate a person with a language. This contrasts with common but outdated advice to caregivers to choose a single language when speaking to their child, and is consistent with research showing that bilingual infants learn languages from a variety of family language strategies.

Manuscript 3 examined how bilingual infants mentally represent the sounds in familiar words. Bilingual and monolingual infants were tested to examine whether bilingual infants are more or less sensitive to mispronunciations than monolinguals. I tested 24- to 26-month-olds in a looking-while-listening task. I found a robust mispronunciation effect in bilingual and monolingual toddlers, indicating that bilinguals' encoding of sounds in familiar words is phonetically detailed in a similar way as monolinguals', despite bilinguals having to navigate a more complex phonetic environment.

In these three manuscripts, I found that bilingual language acquisition is similar to monolingual development in many aspects, and rigorous testing of assumptions about bilingual language acquisition is needed to learn about the mechanisms bilingual infants use to acquire language.

Back to top

© Concordia University