Skip to main content

Design effective assessment tasks

Learn about designing effective assessment tasks to promote deeper learning, increase students’ motivation and engagement, and allow all students to demonstrate their learning.

Overview

Once you have determined the type of assessment to use in your course and your assessment plan is aligned with the course’s learning outcomes, there are considerations to keep in mind during the process of designing the assignments. These include:

  • Planning the scope and sequence of the assessment task and scaffolding learning.
  • Whenever possible, incorporating relevant, contextualized, authentic tasks that are meaningful to students.
  • Ensuring that assessment tasks are inclusive and accessible.
  • Allowing students choice in what they will produce to demonstrate their learning.
  • Checking if assignments are secure vis-a-vis GenAI integrity.

Scaffold assessments to promote deep learning

Scaffolding assessments involves:

  • breaking down a large, complicated task into smaller, manageable parts or;
  • designing a sequence of tasks that gradually increases in complexity.

Before deciding on whether to scaffold an assignment, consider the scope and sequence details of the assessment task. The scope refers to the depth and breadth of content and skills it will cover, while the sequence refers to the order that the students will follow as they undertake the work. In a multiple-choice exam, this will relate to the content you include and the way you group it together, while in a broader assessment task (e.g., a research paper that requires students to construct a response to an open-ended question), it may also include the parameters students should work within and the different elements they will need to include to complete the project.

The research on learning tells us that students acquire new knowledge by building on existing knowledge (Ambrose et al., 2010). Therefore, when assessments are scaffolded to build on one another, it provides the opportunity for students to progressively practice old skills while learning new skills and content.

Central to the concept of scaffolding is the support provided to students from the instructor and/or peers as they work through the assignment sequence. Providing feedback on their work at regular intervals throughout the learning process will help students master each step before proceeding further.

There are different ways you can scaffold assignments in your course:

Tracking the student’s process for a large assignment promotes deeper learning and improves the quality of student work because it provides multiple opportunities for feedback on different aspects of their work. This type of scaffolding also helps students get started on complex assignments early and ensures they are on track throughout. As a result, they will be less likely to feel overwhelmed by the complexity of the task and less tempted to cut corners. 

There are a variety of ways to build a process approach in your assessment. You can ask students to submit evidence of their information gathering and planning or have staged assessments wherein students submit partially completed work prior to final submission.

You can decide whether to simply collect evidence of student work throughout the process, provide formative, non-graded feedback to students at each collection stage, or to attribute grades to student work as collected. The milestones you choose can be evidence of progress (i.e. research question, list of sources) used to develop metacognition (i.e. one page reflection) or can be parts of the larger assignment (i.e. bibliography).

See an example from Dartmouth University of a research assignment broken down into discrete steps.

Another means to build success with smaller tasks, or scaffold assignments, is to continually raise the bar. For example, if you require regular reading summaries or responses, you can scaffold these by assigning progressively more complex and/or abstract readings. Similarly, if assignments focus on problems or different kinds of tasks, you can increase the task difficulty and complexity with each assignment. For example, you could increase the level of thinking required in successive assignments from summarizing a reading, to analyzing it, to finally evaluating it.

Frame assignments around students’ experience, backgrounds and interests

A powerful way to engage and include all students is to design assignments that require students to relate the work to their personal experience, context, or interests. Research shows that we link new information to what we already know, so the more we can ground new information in existing knowledge and personal experience, the easier it is for us to learn (Bean, 2011). 

Here are a few suggestions to guide you: 

  • Ask students to select a course topic and investigate it through the lens of their own lived experience, community context, or belief system. 
  • Ask students to explain how a specific course topic (i.e. how a certain kind of mathematical equation) can be used in their own lives. 
  • Give students a choice in the type of artifact they submit for grading (i.e. paper, webpage, oral presentation, podcast, video, etc.). 

Ensure assessments are inclusive and accessible to all students

Designing your assignments to be inclusive and accessible can minimize the likelihood of students being disadvantaged, excluded or overlooked in the assessment process. Increasingly, there is a consensus that assignments designed to include all students are integral to good pedagogical practice and benefit all students (Hanesworth, 2019). Adopting principles of inclusive assessment design can, moreover, maintain standards while also generating more opportunities for students to demonstrate the breadth and depth of their learning (Universities UK & National Union of Students, 2019). 

Presented in no particular order

  • Make it known to students which of the course’s learning outcomes will be assessed in the assignment and what the assessment criteria are (Guðjónsdóttir & Óskarsdóttir, 2016). 
    • This ensures that all students understand the expectations and requirements of an assignment, regardless of their backgrounds or abilities. Learn more about assessment criteria and transparency as inclusive practices.
  • Create clear assignment descriptions, including the learning students will be applying (explaining course concepts, investigating course concepts, challenging course concepts, etc.) and reference the course content (lectures, chapters, class activities) that will help students complete the assignment.
    • This helps students understand how the assignment relates to the course material, providing a clear roadmap for the completion of work. Including course concepts in assignment descriptions can help students grasp the underlying principles and theories they must apply. Also, ensuring students understand the purpose and objective of an assignment motivates them to delve deeper into the course topic and develop a more comprehensive understanding.
  • Provide choices and multiple options for assignments, including choice between different topics and choice between different formats of assignment (oral presentation, podcast, game, poem, comic, video. etc.), as much as possible.
    • This allows students to choose assignments that align with their strengths, interests, learning preferences and abilities (Waterfield & West, 2008). This practice also reinforces the notion that students are in control of their learning and can be trusted to know the best way to express their understanding, positioning instructors as facilitator and supporter of learning. As an inclusive practice, it can also reduce the number of individual adjustments to assessments (Tai et al, 2022). 
  • Adopt self-assessment and student reflection as a component of assignment grading.
    • This encourages students to gain a deeper understanding of their strengths and challenges. Promoting opportunities for students to express in their own words their needs and experiences helps instructors identify and address any barriers to learning and provide tailored support based on student reflections. This also emphasizes the role of self-reflection in learning, including reflection on how one is learning and how they are impacting the learning of others (Centre for Teaching & Learning, 2023).
  • Design timed assessments such as take-home or in-person exams so that students can complete them in less than the allotted time.
    • This allows students who encounter obstacles when reading, writing, processing or recalling information to demonstrate their learning without undue anxiety due to time constraints. It can also decrease the need for accommodations for students who encounter the above-mentioned obstacles. 

References

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons. https://firstliteracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/How-Learning-Works.pdf

Bean, J. (2011). Designing tasks to promote active thinking and learning. Engaging Ideas (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Centre for Teaching & Learning, Concordia University. (2023). Demystifying inclusive pedagogy. https://opentextbooks.concordia.ca/demystifying-inclusive-pedagogy/

Guðjónsdóttir, H., & Óskarsdóttir, E. (2016). Inclusive education, pedagogy and practice. Science Education Towards Inclusion, 7–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318775330_Inclusive_education_pedagogy_and_practice

Hanesworth, P. (2019). Inclusive assessment: Where next? Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/inclusive-assessment-where-next

Killam, L., Luctkar-Flude, M., & Tyerman, J. (2024). Shaping social justice values through inclusive assessment and debriefing of eLearning modules. Journal of Nursing Education, 63(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230612-09

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2022). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451

Universities UK & National Union of Students. (2019). Black, Asian and minority ethnic student attainment at UK universities: #Closing the gap. (Report). https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads/2021-07/bame-student-attainment.pdf

Waterfield, J. & West, B. (2008). Towards inclusive assessments in higher education: Case study. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (3): 97-102. https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3858/2/Lathe_3_Waterfield_West.pdf

Attribution: This page is adapted from  "Course design" by Concordia Centre for Teaching and Learning which is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Back to top

© Concordia University