Skip to main content

Plan your assessment strategy

Learn to recognize the difference between formative and summative assessment and how using an alignment strategy helps ensure that your assignments are planned to gauge the course’s learning outcomes.

Planning assessments

Planning and aligning your assessments with your learning outcomes is central to effective assessment design and is key to good course design. In this way, you ensure that your assessment tasks match and measure the most essential knowledge, skills, and values you intend for your students to develop in your course. 

When designing or redesigning a course, after you have determined the desired learning outcomes, the next step is to plan the assessments that will allow you to gauge whether students are meeting the planned learning outcomes. A good first step is to determine the formative and summative assessments for a given course. The next step is to determine the course alignment.

Types of assessment

Assessments are generally categorized into two main types (Black et al., 1998): 

Formative assessment is ongoing throughout the semester, allows you to monitor students’ progress in learning and provide feedback so students can identify gaps between your expectations and their learning. By encouraging students to monitor their learning based on the feedback they receive, this kind of assessment gives students more agency around their learning and can help them better achieve the learning outcomes. Formative assessment usually has low stakes, which means it has little or no point value in a student’s grade. Focusing on improving student learning early on and throughout the semester can also help ensure that students are adequately prepared for summative assessments. It can be helpful to think of formative assessment as assessment for learning.

Examples include:

Summative assessment takes place at designated times in the semester to measure competence and usually contributes with higher stakes to a student’s grade. In this type of assessment, students’ learning is measured at the end of a unit or course against a predetermined standard. It can be helpful to think of summative assessment as assessment of learning. 

Examples include:

  • Alternatives to exams or term papers (e.g., multimedia projects, podcasts, two-stage exams, etc.) 
  • Final projects or papers
  • Midterm exams

Course alignment

In an aligned course, each learning outcome has at least one (but preferably more) ways of assessing student learning. This alignment process also helps focus the design of assessments so that you are measuring exactly what you intend to measure and that there are no unnecessary assessment tasks.

The example below comes from a Business Information Technologies Course where students have to explore the role of information technology in business organizations. This example demonstrates how each learning outcome is assessed with each of the course assignments and final exam. 

Note that, as a best practice, each learning outcome should be evaluated a minimum of two times in a course. In this example, we can see that each assessment evaluates at least one course outcome. Depending on how many learning outcomes your course has and how specific they are, each assessment can evaluate a single outcome or multiple outcomes, as you see fit.

Reference

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Back to top

© Concordia University