Concordia University

http://www.concordia.ca/content/concordia/en/artsci/philosophy/faculty.html

Ulf Hlobil, PhD

Assistant Professor, Philosophy

Office: S-M 309 
M Annex,
2135 Mackay
Phone: (514) 848-2424 ext. 2536
Email: ulf.hlobil@concordia.ca
Website(s): PhilPapers
Academia.edu
Availability: Office hours: Monday 10:30–11:30, and by appointment

Education

Ph.D.

University of Pittsburgh, 2016



University of Leipzig, Doctoral Fellow at the Forschungskolleg Analytic German Idealism, 2015


M.A.

University of Trier, Magister Artium in Philosophy, 2010


Dipl.

University of Trier, Diplom in Psychology, 2008




Publications

Papers

Ulf Hlobil (2016). A Nonmonotonic Sequent Calculus for Inferentialist Expressivists. In Pavel Arazim and Michal Dančák (eds.) The Logica Yearbook 2015 (pp. 87-105), College Publications: London.

Ulf Hlobil (2016). Social Norms and Unthinkable Options. Synthese 193(8):2519–2537.

Ulf Hlobil and Katharina Nieswandt (2016). On Anscombe’s Philosophical Method. Klesis Revue Philosophique 35: 180–198.

Ulf Hlobil (2016). Chains of Inferences and the New Paradigm in the Psychology of Reasoning. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7(1):1-16.

Ulf Hlobil (2015). Anti-Normativism Evaluated. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23(3):376-395.

Ulf Hlobil (2015). There Are Diachronic Norms of Rationality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4(1):38-45.

Ulf Hlobil (2014). Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on Inference. Philosophical Studies 167(2):419-429.

Ulf Hlobil, Chaturbhuj Rathore, Aley Alexander,Sankara Sarma & KurupathRadhakrishnan (2008). Impaired Facial Emotion Recognition in Patients withMesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Associated with Hippocampal Sclerosis (MTLE-HS):Side and Age at Onset Matters. Epilepsy Research 80(2-3):150–157.

Edited and Translated Book

Katharina Nieswandt & Ulf Hlobil (eds.) (2014). G.E.M. Anscombe: Aufsätze. Suhrkamp: Berlin.

Review

Ulf Hlobil (2010). Regel und Witz. Wittgensteinsche Perspektiven auf Mathematik, Sprache und Moral. Zeitschrift für PhilosophischeForschung 64 (3):416-419.

Back to top

© Concordia University