This course offers a methodologically pluralist introduction to historical analysis and methods in the social sciences. Social scientists working in different disciplines and different research programs have varying, sometimes competing, assumptions about what it means to be “historical.” Rather than take sides, the course surveys and compares varied self-avowedly historical contemporary research programs: new institutional economic history, comparative historical analysis, historical institutionalism, and historical sociology. As we move across these research programs, we follow cross-disciplinary contrasts and connections to see how history has been analyzed by an array of economists, political scientists, and sociologists.
In our readings we engage reflective and prescriptive pronouncements about the substantive and methodological orientation of research programs alongside concrete examples of historical work. The aim is to examine and evaluate both the framing and actual research practices of each program. Our workshop sessions will be run as seminars in which I provide an organizational outline and introductory remarks, but the bulk of class time is devoted to active discussion of the readings. Participants who are themselves planning or undertaking historical research are welcome and indeed encouraged to connect issues in the readings to choices and challenges they face in their own research. The goal of the sessions is to help workshop participants to identify, understand, and assess the varied assumptions, pronouncements, and practices of diverse contemporary research programs in historical social science, and to spur those undertaking historical research to articulate the particular modes of historical analysis and methods that best fit their own intellectual interests, aims, and intended audience.
Workshop Outline & Reading List
Workshop Part II - Saturday, January 11
Session 1 - Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science
2:00pm - 3:20pm
Orfeo Fioretos, Tulia G. Falleti, and Adam Sheingate, “Historical Institutionalism in Political Science,” in The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, eds. Orfeo Fioretos, Tulia G. Falleti, and Adam Sheingate(Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015), chap. 1.
Giovanni Capoccia, “Critical Junctures,” in Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015), chap. 5.
Bruce Morrison, “Channeling the ‘Restless Spirit of Innovation’: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832,” World Politics 63, no. 4 (2011): 678-710.
Thomas Ertman, “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and British Democratization,” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 8/9 (2010): 1000-102.
Session 3 - Historical Sociology after the Cultural Turn
5:00pm – 6:20pm
Julia Adams, Elisabeth S. Clemens, and Ann Shola Orloff, “Social Theory, Modernity, and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology,“ in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, eds. Adams, Clemens, and Orloff (Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2005), chap. 1.
William H. Sewell, Jr., “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille,” Theory and Society 25, no. 6 (1996): 841-81.
In 2020, for the first time, the WSSR is collaborating with the Southern Political Science Association and is hosting a series of half- and full-day workshops during their conference in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Join us between January 8th and January 11th and attend one or more of our workshops: